Thursday, 21 September 2017

Atlas Shrugged, but I'll be buggered if I will!

I quote from Ayn Rand’s anti-socialist masterpiece, Atlas Shrugged,. specifically the conversation between Ragnar Danneskjöld and Hank Rearden upon first meeting. We begin with Ragnar Danneskjöld speaking:
“ . . .. But I’ve chosen a special mission of my own. I’m after a man whom I want to destroy. He died many centuries ago, but until the last trace of him is wiped out of men’s minds, we will not have a decent world to live in.”
“What man?”
“Robin Hood.”
Rearden looked at him blankly, not understanding.
“He was the man who robbed the rich and gave to the poor. Well, I’m the man who robs the poor and gives to the rich-or, to be exact, the man who robs the thieving poor and gives to the productive rich.”
“What in blazes do you mean?”
“If you remember the stories you’ve read about me in the newspapers, before they stopped printing them, you know that I have never robbed a private ship and never taken any private property. Nor have I ever robbed a military vessel-because the purpose of the military fleet is to protect from violence the citizens who paid for it, which is the proper function of a government. But I have seized every loot-carrier that came within range of my guns, every government relief ship, subsidy ship, loan ship, gift ship, every vessel with a cargo of goods taken by force from some men for the unpaid, unearned benefit of others. I am fighting: the idea that need is a sacred idol requiring human sacrifices-that the need of some men is the knife of a guillotine hanging over others-that all of us must live with our work, our hopes, our plans, our efforts at the mercy of the moment when the knife will descend upon us-and that the extent of our ability is the extent of our danger, so that success will bring our heads down on the block, while failure will give us the right to pull the cord. This is the horror which Robin Hood immortalized as an ideal of righteousness. It is said he fought against the looting rulers and returned the loot to those who had been robbed, but that is not the meaning of the legend which has survived. He is remembered not as a champion of property, but as a champion of need, not as a defender of the robbed, but as a provider of the poor. He is held to be the first man who assumed a halo of virtue by practicing charity with wealth he did not own, by giving away goods which he had not produced, by making others pay for the luxury of his pity. He is the man who became the symbol of the idea that need, not achievement, is the source of rights, that we don’t have to produce, only to want, that the earned does not belong to us, but the unearned does. He became a justification for every mediocrity who, unable to make his own living, has demanded the power to dispose of the property of his betters, by proclaiming his willingness to devote his life to his inferiors at the price of robbing his superiors. It is this foulest of creatures-the double parasite who lives on the sores of the poor and the blood of the rich-whom men have come to regard as a moral ideal. And this has brought us to a world where the more a man produces, the closer he comes to the loss of all his rights, until, if his ability is great enough, he becomes a rightless creature delivered as prey to any claimant-while in order to be placed above rights, above principles, above morality, placed where anything is permitted to him, even plunder and murder, all a man has to do is to be in need. Do you wonder why the world is collapsing around us? That is what I am fighting, Mr Rearden. Until men learn that of all human symbols, Robin Hood is the most immoral and most contemptible, there will be no justice on earth and no way for mankind to survive.”
Rearden listened, feeling numb. But under the numbness, like the first thrust of a seed breaking through, he felt an emotion he could not identify except that it seemed familiar and very distant, like something experienced and renounced long ago.
“What I actually am, Mr Rearden, is a policeman. It is the policeman’s duty to protect men from criminals-criminals being those who seize wealth by force. It is the policeman’s duty to retrieve stolen property and return it to its owners. But when robbery becomes the purpose of the law, and the policeman’s duty becomes, not the protection, but the plunder of property-then it is an outlaw who has to become a policeman.”  End of quote.

I'm sure you all see what RD is saying, in the context of the situation we now find ourselves in in this Rainbow Shithole Abortion.
The thieving poor = ANC, SACP, Unions, etc., and their subservient, “gimme free-stuff” minions – the riff-raff of society with a sense of entitlement, although they have never achieved or produced one iota.
The productive rich = farmers, industrialists and all other producers and contributors to the economic and social well-being of civilised society.
You see, what these cANCerous useful idiot creatures who govern us [for the time being, anyway] are too stupid to understand, is that they are merely the totally dispensable pawns in the Illuminati / NWO / OWG’s game. Just as the White libs [more useful idiots] who further the creatures’ agenda will be dispensed with, by the very creatures they now so diligently serve. Once they’ve served their purpose, so will the creatures be dispensed with, once they have served their interim masters’ purpose.
Do you, for one moment, think that the NWO, with their target of 500 million “sustainable population” for earth, will allow this specie to survive? This creature that breeds incessantly and indiscriminately, who has never and never will produce anything, who only destroys everything it comes into contact with will be exterminated like the parasite it is. The world has mechanised and there is no longer a need for hewers of wood and bearers of water and especially not for those, who throughout all eternity, have never been capable of even sustaining that which it spawns.
No, my friends, the writing is also on the wall for them. After we, the rightminded Whites, who stand in the way of the Illuminati’s goals have been dispensed with the parasite will follow.
The cANCer, just like Robin Hood is proud to proclaim that they will take from those who have spent their lives producing and give it to those who have never produced and who have no intention, or capability, of ever doing so. If the cANCer implodes, as they are likely to do by 2019, the EFFluent are already being groomed to take their place, in case the goals haven't been achieved yet. [I refer to Juliaas's meeting with Lord Renwick and others].
So, it is our duty to our forefathers , those creators of civilisation and our Christian God, to defend our faith, heritage and the centuries of civilisation that the White Tribes of Western Europe, the descendants of the 10 Lost Tribes, cultivated.
We have to become outlaw-policemen, like Ragnar Danneskjöld, and defy the immoral authorities in any and every [legal - for now] way possible.
Already their tax collection is waning. The police are ineffective and the mobs are overrunning them. The SANDF we won't even talk about. Anarchy, I believe, is just over the horizon.  Our salvation or our destruction, you choose which it will be for you. I know what my choice is . . .
It's five-to-midnight, ladies and gentlemen, and the clock, she's a-tickin'!
Be prepared.



Tuesday, 5 September 2017

Denying Our Heritage & Ethnicity.

I quote this libtard, :

"JOHANNESBURG - An anthropology professor said the display of the apartheid-era South African flag will sow division.
Several businesses have been heavily criticized for their display of the flag.
They said the flag is part of the country's history.
"It's really just about the Afrikaners feeling of proprietary owning the country and it's the same thing as the verse of die stem which we find in our national anthem. It's really for Afrikaners only if you know what those words mean they don't really relate to other communities. So my problem is it memorialises Afrikaans nationalism and white supremacy it's not just a matter of history only. And of course, they have this problem in the US with the old confederate flag which they say is part of Southern history but is very prejudicial and ethnic oriented and divisive history. So if people in SA really want to be South African and pull together as I do. I don't think we should be displaying that flag," said Wits University, Professor David Coplan."

What an absolute fucking nitwit!

Firstly, let me say, the old flag IS a part of our history and it's not an Apartheid flag at all. It came into being in 1928, fully 20 years before the National Party came to power and started their program of Separate Development. Apartheid was slang, inspired by the Zionists and proliferated by the liberal scum of this world - the useful idiots of which Coplan is obviously one - to, as always, the detriment of the gullible Goyim. Missionaries & acadaemia have always been the downfall of the White Tribes of this world.

The only thing wrong with that flag, in my opinion is that it has the Union Jack included. But, hey, it's part of our history, so I can live with it. It signifies the unification of the two Boer Republics and the British colonies of Natal and the Cape - a travesty if ever there was one, but that's also history. So, Professor Coplan, as you can see, it is in no way an Afrikaner flag as you state. Get your facts straight, please.

The Afrikaner, or rather Boer flags, are the Vierkleur and the Free State flag. There were many Afrikaners in the Cape and Natal who owed no allegiance to the Boer flags. I will fly the old national flag together with the "Vierkleur", the FS flag and "The Stars & Bars" where and whenever I wish to and be damned with those who have an issue with it.

My aversion to the Union Jack stems from the fact that this country was mercilessly exploited for the insatiable greed of the British Empire. If there ever was a viler coloniser, I am hard-pressed to think of one. Kimberley was part of the OFS Republic until the discovery of diamonds. I am not going into the details of that thievery. Suffice it to say that the "princely" sum of 90 000 Pounds was paid as compensation for the, then, richest diamond field on earth.

Then British greed reared its head again with the discovery of diamonds in German South West Africa, in what became known as the Sperrgebiet around Luderitzbucht. This was their motivation for South Africa to invade their friendly neighbour. A neighbour who posed no threat whatsoever to the British Empire in the ensuing First World War, who had a garrison of about 1400 troops only in the vast colony. A colony of Germany, who a mere 12 years before had been a staunch ally of the Boers in the Second Anglo Boer War. The volksverraaier, Jan Smuts, acting on instructions from his lord and masters, those of his Round Table group, a spawn of the Illuminati & the Zionists, inspired the Boers, or tried to, to take up weapons against the erstwhile allies.

This led to Die Rebellie of 1914 when Generals Manie Maritz, Kemp, Chistiaan de Wet, Beyers and a host of other Boer leaders, who had the courage of their moral convictions, rebelled against the Botha government. General Beyers had been Commandant General of the Defence Force until then and resigned in disgust because of Slim Jannie Smuts' determination to attack their former allies. Botha simply went along with anything Smuts insisted on. So brother bore arms against brother. That is Jan Smuts'  vilest legacy to this country. That and the blatant murder of Jopie Fourie. He was once a hero of mine, until I learnt the truth.

It was never about the military threat, but solely about the riches of the Sperrgebiet Diamond Fields. The greatest tragedy to befall this country was that the Rebellie didn't succeed.

Be that as it may, I think I've said enough to justify The Empire's greed and my slight aversion to the inclusion of the Union Jack in MY flag. Yes, that's right Professor Coplan, my flag. You see, I want no part of this maid's bloomer they call a flag now or the unholy ditty that is supposedly a national anthem. In short, I want no part of the illegal and immoral New South Africa. The Rainbow Nation is an absolute disaster. Oh, the libs will try to refute this, but let them open their eyes and see the destruction that has been wrought on our once pristine and beautiful cities by their darling, noble savages.

Who has a problem with "The Stars and Bars" in the US? Only the liberal scum who try their utmost to deny their heritage and grovel and squirm before the Satan's spawn.

In short, I am proud to be White. I am proud to be a descendant of the 10 Tribes of Israel. I am proud of my heritage. I feel not one iota of guilt for my whiteness and privilege. I've earned it and my forebears before me earned it for me. I am proud to be a part of the tribe that brought civilisation to the world, of my White Western European ancestors. I am proud to have contributed to building a better world for my tribe, a world that the savages, empowered by liberal scum, are destroying faster than we built it, for that is the nature of the beast, it can only destroy. It is incapable of anything else. I want "division". I do not want to associate with the beasts in any way.

Finally, I am proud to be a modern day Viking. And, like those indomitable warriors, I will fight to the death to preserve my heritage and everything that it encompasses. I was prepared to before and it will come to that again.